Javascript frameworks (Dojo,JQuery, and so on that are not compatible with each other.) would help but they themselves are not enough with added complexity. BTW, good luck debugging and maintaining code written in HTML5+JavaScript+OthersRequired.
And compare that with the same created with Flash/Flex. If you disagree or can't see what the differences are, go and knock yourself out trying to create a highly interactive, dynamic web, and sophisticated content with HTML5+Javascript+CSS+SomeMiddleWareTechnology. Let's not even get into the browser compatibility issues, all of the various middleware technologies (not so compatible with each other) needed to "push" the data/business logic to the app running inside the browser, and deep lack of tools to generate highly interactive, dynamic, and sophisticated and professional looking content for HTML.
It requires highly complex and bloated Javascript and CSS to mimic even the simple things in Flash/Flex. Second, (don't get fooled by the marketing campaigns) HTML5 by itself doesn't mean anything. On the other hand, Flash/Flex was created/architected to serve highly dynamic and interactive content, like desktop apps, via Web browser. HTML (go and read up on its history) was created to serve static content with very low level of interactivity, if any, via Web browser. HTML5+Javascript+CSS+SomeMiddlewareTechnology really really far stretched in a very ugly way may "mimic" Flash/Flex.įirst, it's like comparing apples with oranges. From my experience, HTML5 (with some additional video/audio and layout tag) is NOT a Flash/Flex replacement. Anyway, it appears most of the commentators don't have real, in-depth commercial experience (I'm not talking some cute/glossy "hello world" demo or prototype here) with either of the technologies, so the differences might not be obvious.
0 kommentar(er)
